Terrorism prevention Act 2011 and 2013 merged

In 2011 the Nigerian Senate passed into law the Terrorism (Prevention) Act, 2011. Act no.10 It was quite inelegantly drafted and in a bid to suppress the mischief, an amendment was passed into law in 2013.Be that as it may, the 2011 and 2013 Acts existed seperately, thus making it almost impossible to study or understand the Act. This is an attempt to merge the two Acts into one and make sense out of it




https://docs.google.com/uc?export=download&id=0B_e644iOETJld0MyRDFTWXpHUm8Download



click to download the terrorism prevention act 2011 as amended

AG OYO STATE v. NIGERIA LABOUR CONGRESS, OYO STATE

ATTORNEY-GENERAL OF OYO STATE v. NIGERIA LABOUR CONGRESS, OYO STATE CHAPTER & ORS

lawpavilionpersonal.com  

CITATION: (2002) LPELR-CA/I/M.110/02

newOTHER CITATIONS: 1 A.-G., Oyo State v. N.L.C. [2003] 8 NWLR (Pt.821)pg. 1 23

Nigerian Coat of Arms

In The Court of Appeal

(Ibadan Judicial Division)

On Monday, the 9th day of December, 2002

Suit No: CA/I/M.110/02

ADEYEYE v. THE STATE

OJO ADEYEYE V. THE STATE

 (2013) LPELR-19913(SC)

           

In The Supreme Court of Nigeria

On Friday, the 1st day of February, 2013

SC.305/2010

SHANDE v. STATE

       

 EJIWUNMI, J.S.C.: (Delivering the Leading Judgment): This appeal may be rightly described as the fury or rage into which a jealous wife could be driven. Before the appellant in this appeal was arraigned before the High Court of Benue State in the Benue State Judicial Division, holden at Makurdi upon the application of the prosecution to prefer a charge brought pursuant to section 185(b) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The said application was supported by proofs of evidence, the statement of the appellant and the medical report of the deceased. As the learned trial Judge, having read the said application with the documents attached thereto, granted leave for the preferment of the charge against the appellant. The court also ordered that the appellant be served with the proofs of evidence and the charge.

OYEROGBA v. EGBEWOLE

JACOB OYEROGBA & ANOR v. EGBEWOLE OLAOPA

 (1998) LPELR-2878(SC)

           

In The Supreme Court of Nigeria

On Friday, the 18th day of December, 1998

SC.300/1990

TERRORISM (PREVENTION) (AMENDMENT) ACT, 2013

TERRORISM (PREVENTION) (AMENDMENT)  ACT, 2013 EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM

This Act amends the Terrorism (Prevention) Act No. 10, 2011,  makes provision for extra-territorial application of the Act and  strengthens terrorist financing offences.

CORROBORATION IN NIGERIA: IS THERE ANY JUSTIFICATION FOR THE REQUIREMENT OF CORROBORATION IN RAPE CASES- - - ANEKE, KENECHUKWU CHRISTOPHER

CORROBORATION IN NIGERIA: IS THERE ANY JUSTIFICATION FOR THE REQUIREMENT OF CORROBORATION IN RAPE CASES?*

                       

                                                                        ABSTRACT

  Rape on the prosecutrix leaves a scar on her soul, but a false accusation of rape on a man may also leave a scar on his whole personality. Rape is the most morally and physically reprehensible crime in a society as it is an assault on the body, mind and privacy of the victim...a rapist degrades and defiles the soul of a helpless female. Rape shakes the very core of her life. Rape is tantamount to a serious blow to the supreme honour of a woman, and offends, both her esteem and dignity.[1] This paper examines the procedural requirement of corroboration, in rape cases, of the evidence of the prosecutrix. The paper wishes to justify, to some extent, the requirement of corroboration in rape cases.